SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Orcastraiter who wrote (522639)1/11/2004 10:40:03 PM
From: Gus  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
The bottom line is that Saddam was not an imminent threat. And since this was the reason given for attacking Iraq, it is now shown to be baseless.

No wonder you sound confused! You don't even understand the meaning of the word 'imminent' which I have defined for you below as a matter of courtesy.

im·mi·nent (ĭm'ə-nənt)
adj.

About to occur; impending: in imminent danger.

[Middle English iminent, from Old French imminent, from Latin imminçns, imminent-, present participle of imminçre, to overhang : in-, in; see in–2 + -minçre, to jut, threaten.]


Here is the exact quote from State of the Union speech that justified our actions <font color=red>before </font>the danger became imminent.

<font color=blue>
President George W Bush, State of the Union speech January 28, 2003

Some have said we must not act until the threat is </font><font color=red>imminent.</font><font color=blue> Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.


usefulwork.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext