SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: portage who wrote (34815)1/12/2004 12:35:58 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (1) of 89467
 
The denials of apologists are pathetic

After being away from my workstation for a while, I got back in time to catch the end of a Ted David - Alan Murray conversation (I usually have CNBC on mute). It was beyond pathetic. According to Murray, it was all just "sour grapes" on the part of O'Neill because of being fired.


        He was acting like he was a CEO boss, and
        didn't fit in. After all the Bush people 
        said they wanted regime change for Saddam
        back in the campaign, so that wasn't news
        to anybody.


Muray also played down the Reagan deficit conversation. He certainly didn't bring up the Cheney "our due" comment or Rove's "Stick to principle" or “Don’t waver" comments, that are in the transcript. He compared O'Neill to David Stockman in a dismissive way.

So spin, obfuscation, ignoring and maybe few statements that are loose with the truth, seems to be CNBC's response.

Like I said - beyond pathetic.

JMO

lurqer
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News