SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TigerPaw who wrote (5663)1/13/2004 4:13:10 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) of 20773
 
Kay's report tries to speak, as have you, in vague ideas where a microscope is called evidence of "possible" experiments

Is this a fair characterization? The reality is that there continue to be 2 million liters of chemical agent that go unaccounted for - 2 million liters that could be stored in a very small, unventilated, hidden space. We know they had it; nobody disagrees about that. We know they haven't used it. We know that if that chemical agent was destroyed, it was TOTALLY in Saddam's interest that he provide documentation of that destruction. Yet, he could not document such destruction.

That, taken alone, is sufficient evidence of WMD under the terms of the ceasefire and the UN resolutions to justify us attacking Iraq. We don't need anything else. Kay's evidence is just further support.

It is amazing to me the extent to which liberals will go to avoid the indisputable fact (amongst thinking people, at least) that removal of Saddam was mandatory.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News