Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (24603)	1/15/2004 11:18:16 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (3) of 793697

No, the Dems ignored the Bush AWOL issue in 2000. It has never been used against Bush except on the internet. The only pundit I've ever heard mention it was on Crossfire during a heated exchange. Paul Begala. But all Dems know Bush took off when it was his time to serve. And if I had been him I would have too. Even so, I am not pretending I am the military crusader of the first world. Gore was too nice a guy to bring it up. Besides, military service didn't matter in 2000. But now we have a president running on his military record as commander in chief. That is Bush's #1 issue. So while a DEan looks like a wimp compared to Bush, the tables are turned against Kerry and Clark, both of whom have Silver Stars, Purple Hearts and have killed and goten shot of shrapeled for their country. That's why Dean has to go. Godbye Dean and thank God Iowa voters figured it out in time. I expect Dean to lose Iowa or win only by a few votes. Either way the bloom is off the rose and he will go down.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next