SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Scamthony Cataldo

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: scion who wrote (78)1/16/2004 9:19:03 AM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) of 137
 
Mohamed Hadid

FIRST EQUITY PROPERTIES INC filed this 8-K on 02/25/1997

The Complaint seeks monetary damages against all defendants
other than Qualis Care L.P., Medical Resource and Nevada Sea; treble
damages and punitive damages against all RICO Defendants; punitive
damages against all defendants other than Qualis Care L.P., Medical
Resource, and Nevada Sea. Medical Resource/Nevada Sea and Qualis have
reached an agreement with respect to their competing interest to the
5,724,692 shares of Wespac stock (USREA Stock). Qualis has filed a
withdrawal of the Proof of Interest relating to said shares filed by
Qualis the 29th day of February, 1996 and has agreed to the entry of a
dismissal of Qualis from this litigation with prejudice, which bars
Qualis, Medical Resource, Nevada Sea, and Wespac from ever asserting
any claim against each other arising from the sale or purported sale
of Wespac stock to Qualis but reserves any claims Qualis may have
against other arising from such sale or purported sale. Wespac, with
Court approval has compromised the claim against Zimco and Mohamed
Hadid for the sum of $100,000.00.
It is anticipated that Joel Ciniero
will be dismissed as a party defendant for his voluntary cooperation
in providing discovery and testimony as may be requested by Wespac
regarding the factual issues to be determined in that case. Wespac has
filed motions for orders of default as to the other defendants.
Wespac, in its discretion, may dismiss the District Court action, if
for example, it appears the cost of said litigation outweighs the
potential for recovery or collectability from any named defendant.

10kwizard.com.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext