Booms, Busts, and Recoveries Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (44825)	1/16/2004 8:33:17 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (2) of 74559

Seems we kinda agree here... I'm sure you must see the light now. seems to be the ultimate capabilities are similar but best results for both genders are not arrived at following identical paths... they need to start three years before boys There is a flip side to that Maurice... Girls are then by definition capable of much higher operation levels younger... some stimuli appropriate for my daughter @ 3 were utterly wasted on my son at 3. You raise an interesting point. In my experience my son has a much lower 'saturation' level than my daughter had (speaking in equivalence of age terms) so maybe he needs longer stimulation period as a consequence.... From personal observation and experience I'd strongly agree with your statement stop just dumping all children into an age cohort . I was very fortunate in some ways throughout elementary school. Skipped one grade (was not challenged) and was always placed in 'special' classes (no not remedial ;o)a few were pretty unconventional). I don't think math so is a fair indicator.. It is more a means (as you know) of expression. I know a few math stupid brilliant folks.. Smart like love is not enough regards Kastel

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next