SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (35598)1/18/2004 9:55:24 PM
From: lurqer  Read Replies (5) of 89467
 
Kinda afraid you'd respond as you did. Do you recall your reaction when JW tried to point out to you the difference between its and it's? Do you remember me trying to tell you if you make a long post that is filled with bolding and extra large type face, that people will just skip it? No one likes to be screamed at.

Now if you want to say that Saddam was a bad boy. That in your opinion, if unsupervised, he would have tried to have acquired some WMDs, fine. But, a year ago, the Admin was claiming that Saddam then possessed large quantities of WMDs, and that as a result he was an imminent threat to his neighbors, and us. Ensuing events have rendered that claim indefensible. You want to defend it anyway, go right ahead. Like I said, if you don't mind being a Baghdad Bob. Your choice.

BTW, the Saddam-Al Qaeda link is getting similar guffaws. Just so you know.

Time for reflection?

lurqer
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News