SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 228.76-1.6%10:22 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: fedhead who wrote (159904)1/19/2004 8:20:31 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
1) Iraq was a **** up.

2) His predecessor presided over a greater bubble than the 1920s. We're lucky it isn't worse. So are you ready to criticize Slick Willie for cheering on irrational exuberance? If you are, I might be willing to believe you're honest.

How about AG? He's the guy that started raising interest rates and got the slide started.

3) I can prove that statement clearly and unequivocally WRONG. I've got to find the sources on another computer.

4) No question. His "This is the last amnesty- -again" cost my vote. Enough!
You're worrying about deficits to this point? What do you think will happen when that prescription drug bill kicks in?
All to win the Hispanic and Senior vote.

BTW, who said I wanted to re-elect him? If the Dems give me a decent alternative, I'll take it. They haven't so far. It's tweedle-Marx and tweedle-Lenin. My likeliest vote is Libertarian.

His offenses are far more serious than someone dropping their pants in the oval office.
FYI, Clinton was impeached for perjury, not sex offenses. And he committed perjury. He admitted it. Perjury qualifies under "high crimes and misdemeanors" in the impeachment clause.

America cannot afford 4 more years of Bush.
So who do you suggest? I see no better among the Dems.

I don't get it , why are republicans so enamored of Bush
who has pretty much given their core principles the
shaft all in a cynical bid to get reelected.

Nolo contendre.

It seems incredible to me that Bush's poll numbers are so high.
It's the economy, stupid! As Slick said. It is in fact improving. As of now. Whether that will hold to November is a whole 'nuther question. I'm not betting it will. If you have to try this hard (record low interest rates, big tax breaks) to get this little response, you got a problem.

OTOH, there was that '90s bubble that burst. I KNOW the Dems want to blame this all on Bush, but the facts are that the burst and economic slide started on Slick's watch.

If you want to blame economics on Presidents. Personally, I think it's a whole lot more complicated than that, but if they want to point to Bush, then I'll point right back to Slick. That is where it started.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext