SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AK2004 who wrote (526675)1/20/2004 5:33:43 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Read Replies (1) of 769667
 
Growing Income Disparity and the Middle Class Squeeze

Real weekly wages in the U.S. rose until 1973, and have been declining since. From 1977 - 1989, the wealthiest 660,000 families gained 75% of "average pretax income" increases, while most middle income families saw only a 4% increase -- and those in the bottom 40% of income cohorts had real declines. The average annual earnings of the top group increased from $315,000 to $560,000 in twelve years. In 1990, the median income was $29,934; in 1973, it was $30,943 (constant dollars). Women in the workforce have helped to forestall lifestyle crashes due to this stagnant growth (Newman Declining 40, 42).

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development notes that the U.S. has the most inequitable distribution of income of all the industrialized nations and the middle class is in serious decline; the international bankers are worried about social and economic problems in the U.S. (Dubois 43). The Economist writes that since the 1970s, economic inequities have mushroomed. The top income quintile is doing great, the bottom quintile is declining (not in numbers, but in income). The conditions of the poor are described as "bad" (34). A survey of 26 industrialized nations (the Luxembourg Income Study) found that the gap between the wealthiest 10% and the poorest 10% is greater in the United States than any other country except Russia (Wallechinsky 6). In 1970, the lowest quintile had 5.5% of the national income; in 1990, that group had 3.7% -- a 33% decline in 20 years (Haughton and Schwoyer 88). The Gross National Product rose 33% (in constant dollars), 1975 - 1985 (Bayer 45). The December 1995 Commonweal magazine, using Federal Reserve data, reports that between 1982 and 1994, nonfarm labor productivity increased three times that of the rate of real hourly compensation. Manufacturing productivity rose by 37%, wages and benefits remained flat. The ratio of the compensation of CEOs to the average worker in 1974 was 35 to 1; now it is 150 to 1. Using Council of Economic Advisors data, the article found that the real income of men with high school educations dropped 21% between 1979 and 1990. During 1983 to 1992, the top 1% of households net worth increased from 34% to 42% of all household wealth; the bottom 80% dropped from 18% to 15% (the top 20% in 1989 controlled 85% of all household wealth). The only other comparable era of wealth concentration was 1922 to 1929 (12-13).

So income is flat or declining. But unfortunately, expenditures have not followed income's example. Of the major categories of household expenditures, only food and clothing have shown declines over time (Segal 62). All others are up, many in excess of the general inflationary rate:

-- Since 1930, the percentage of income devoted to transportation has doubled. Real per capita consumer expenditures during this period rose 300%; transportation, 600% (60).

-- The cost of medical care and household costs of medical care rose 50%, 1970 - 1990, in constant dollars (61).

-- The average annual cost of day care is $6,000 year ($120/week). This is a new consumer expenditure that was relatively minor in 1970 (median income during this period rose $2,115, 1970 - 1990) (61).

-- Higher education tuition is rising faster than inflation; from 1975 - 1990 the increase was $4,400 (in constant dollars). Private school tuition has also increased, as the percentage (e.g.) of Catholic parishes offering school attendance to parishioners without additional tuition payment has declined to zero (62).

-- The steep rise in housing prices is detailed in the section on Housing and Urban Renewal.

-- In 1997, it is significantly more expensive to secure the basic household needs than it was in 1970 and before. Some of this relates to the breakdown of previous systems (such as private school tuition and day care). A higher percentage of household income is now required to meet these needs than was true in previous years (59, 62)......

justpeace.org

"...Compared with a generation ago, she found, today's middle-class families earn about 75 percent more (all figures are adjusted for inflation), thanks in large part to Mom's entrance into the work force. But after shelling out for four fixed expenses - mortgage, health insurance, child care or education, and car payments - today's median-income family has less left over, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than the single-income family of the 1970s."

news.harvard.edu

Middle class barely treads water
"A generation ago, a typical American middle-class family lived on the income of a single breadwinner. In recent years it has taken two working spouses to live the modern middle-class dream..."

By Christine Dugas, USA TODAY
usatoday.com

The Lagging Income of the Middle Class
James Surowiecki
Posted Tuesday, Jan. 18, 2000, at 4:20 PM PT

slate.msn.com

Death of the Middle Class:

newint.org
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext