SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sam who wrote (123471)1/20/2004 7:30:26 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 281500
 
Yes, well, the US was using the inspectors to spy in ways that were opposed to the original agreement, so let's not pretend that he had no cause to not cooperate.

What are you Sam, some kind of Baathist sympathizer? Getting paid to make excuses for Saddam's refusal to abide by his cease-fire obligation?

If Saddam thought the US was using inspectors as spies, he should have pled his case to the UN.

Or is it that Saddam was not required to go to the UN to resolve differences in the inspection process?

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News