Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: X Y Zebra who wrote (12327)	1/23/2004 5:17:04 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) of 14610

the US made the hardest decision and executed the hardest task to rescue Kuwait and the rest of the inepts in the area... so why stop now???? What "letter of the agreement”? I have some suspicions as to why Bush (1) stopped Let's hear Bush Sr out: If he had sent U.S. military forces on to Baghdad, Bush asserted in the 1998 book he wrote with Brent Scowcroft, his national security adviser, "The United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land." If the United States announced such a goal unilaterally, he added, "We would be committing ourselves -- alone -- to removing one regime and installing another and if the Iraqis themselves didn't take matters into their own hands, we would be facing an indefinite occupation of a hostile state and some dubious 'nation-building.' " washingtonpost.com Sounds familiar?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next