Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (123477)	1/24/2004 4:15:49 AM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Hi Hawkmoon; Re: "What are you Sam, some kind of Baathist sympathizer? Getting paid to make excuses for Saddam's refusal to abide by his cease-fire obligation?" This is an ad hominem attack. Re: "If Saddam thought the US was using inspectors as spies, he should have pled his case to the UN." He did plead his case to the UN. His case (that the US was using the UN inspections to illegally spy on Iraq) was supported by testimony from a US inspector. Here's a link to the BBC's notes on Scott Ritter: ... He has argued that the inspection team, Unscom, was a nest of US spies and that Iraq was disarmed long ago. ... news.bbc.co.uk Remember David Kay? The guy so many war supporters on this thread were saying was going to find WMDs in Iraq? Even he now says that Iraq had essentially no WMDs. This isn't about supporting Baathism. It's about supporting the USA. You can't support America with lies. -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next