Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (181616)	1/26/2004 9:49:59 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) of 1575639

Ten, re: So as long as you aren't as unilateral, and you can keep the monetary and human cost of the war down, and you can keep the ulterior political motives less transparent, the double-standard is fine in your book? The fact that Iraq is unilateral demonstrates that there is not a compelling threat. If there was a serious threat to the US and/or our traditional allies, don't you (seriously, no crap) believe that NATO would have been on board? Is the monetary and human cost significant? If not to you, it is to me. Is transparency important? I think so, that's what allows honest debate (as opposed to WMD fear propaganda). Is there a double standard and is it OK? Yes there is, and it's expedient, especially with this administration. Otherwise Bush would be in Iraq, North Korea, Pakistan, Sudan... You were the one that was shocked that an organization demonstrated "double standards". You tell me if a consistent standard is important for this administration. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next