>>>You present such a target-rich environment that I don't know where to start :-)<<<
- dishonest, yes you did
Do you find that a relevant reply to that statement? Or are you going to spew the same petty insult as an answer to whatever I say, like a broken record?
- and even you said it wouldn't have much affect to your reputation
That is the expected effect of your words, yes :-)
Not sure why you agree with me on that, though. Possibly because you failed to understand the implications?
you can't defame an 'alias' or non-named person
If I were you, I wouldn't be so sure to depend so much on the words of sympathetic internet acquaintances who thus lead you on. I have more interesting things to plan for than dragging a rabid little foxy to court and force her to see the limits of her precious freedom to badmouth people. But push me a bit more, and I just might give my lawyer a field day, and you might find out that a lawyer you actually pay is much more motivated to defend you than one who whispers to you on PMs.
I think you have a thing for cheerleaders, you use it often
Your attempts at analysis are quite fascinating to watch, LOL. It is a small wonder that you have survived in this world for so long.
Have you forgotten that it is YOU who takes pride on being a "good cheerleader"? And I agree. You are a good cheerleader.
So, stick to your pompoms and mini-skirt. Aspiring to be one of the players is a good dream, but you need to muscle-up a bit, AND learn about the rules.
Oops. Was that another allegory that you will never understand on your own? :-)
never try and one-up a bitch
I was "trying" nor doing no such thing.
And are you calling yourself "a bitch"? I would have described you by slightly kinder words, but, hey, suit yourself.
--------------------------------------------------
If you don't terribly mind, I would rather end this little exchange here. Debating with you is as gratifying as playing tennis against a crooked wall - not only is there no challenge, but responses are irrational. Your lack of understanding of even the simplest issues like the difference between opinion and policy makes talking about anything more serious than your cheerleading capacity or lunch plans impossible.
Your lack of discipline in sticking to the issue, avoiding ad hominem (look it up, it will do you good), and keeping a civil tongue in your mouth does not help, either.
Last, but not least, debating with you one-on-one is about as dignified as kicking a puppy. Or ridiculing a cheerleader by taking her into the game and tackling her like one of the guys.
So, I'd rather end this correspondence, especially since you don't seem to have anything of relevance to say and are just fixated on petty personal attacks.
Alternatively, we can continue your education at your leisure. |
