SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : HOWARD DEAN -THE NEXT PRESIDENT?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2574)1/28/2004 12:37:41 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor  Read Replies (1) of 3079
 
I believe hammering GW Bush's domestic policy would win more votes than the anti-war theme.

You and I agree completely. And I did not support the Bush approach to Iraq *at all*. But the problem is, you have a factionalized electorate on this issue, and the divide is not across party lines. And then there is the emotion of what to do NOW, when we have troops over there. There are some high-up military men bashing Iraq now (like that Zitti guy), and Tommy Franks is coming out in defense of Bush- this is counterproductive. Pretty much every voter supports Tommy Franks, even if they don't support Bush.

My feeling all along (which admittedly won't fly with voters)- is to elect a star *negotiator* (something Bush sorely lacks) and if that individual does not have the correct military credentials, a military advisor should be appointed. Or, if one individual who possesses both qualities can be found, ala Colin Powell, appoint them. But all this back and forth about which military maneuvers are appropriate now in Iraq is not what we should be electing a president for, in my view. I don't think most voters really buy the "we are at war" line either. Wartime is clearly different than this period.

But on domestic issues we have a completely different situation which resonates with most voters except the very wealthy who Bush panders to. On domestic matters imho Dean is the #1 candidate, although Edwards seems like he might be very strong fighting for the little guy also. I haven't heard too much from Kerry but otoh I haven't heard too many Kerry speaches either. Generally speaking I am looking for an approach to deal with this trade deficit from every candidate. I think the constituency will force it from all the frontrunners, so we should be hearing something (except from Bush who is trying to ignore the issue because the trade imbalance is actually a part of the right wing agenda).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext