SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 36.91-1.1%Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (176717)1/29/2004 12:51:11 PM
From: The Duke of URL©  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Great response from chipguy on Ihub (in order to say the anti-Intel set a lot of time):

Posted by: chipguy
In reply to: dougSF30 who wrote msg# 8490 Date:1/29/2004 12:13:01 PM
Post #of 8495


Itanium Death Watch: Otellini endorses x86-64

This should be good for an immediate surge in K8 orders, and a plunge in Itanium orders.

You guys are too much.

IPF was dead when Merced was late, late, late but it
eventually arrived.

IPF was dead because Merced was mediocre but McKinley
arrived and surprised friends and foe on its degree of
improvement over Merced.

IPF was dead because McKinley didn't establish a clear
lead over the best RISCs but Madison arrived and did.

IPF was dead because Dell didn't support I2 but Madison
arrived and Dell brought out the 3250.

IPF was dead because of its poor x86 compatibility mode
performance but IA-32 EL came out and tripled x86 code
performance.

IPF was dead because of low volume but Intel announces
2003 shipments exceeded 100k units.

Otellini suggests Intel may at some point bring out a
64 bit x86 processor - the IPF boo birds twitter madly.
Yet the same Otellini recently announced that six IPF
processors are in development along with plans to level
processor and platform costs with Xeon - not a sound
from the bird brains then.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext