Should God be replaced? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Greg or e who wrote (16182)	1/29/2004 4:08:19 PM
From: redfish	Read Replies (2) of 28931

"Take the spontaneous generation of everything out of nothing just for starters. Is that observable? No. Is it repeatable? No. Do So called Scientists believe it anyway? Why yes they do, hmmmmmmm?" The Big Bang remains a theory, I don't think many people consider it an established fact. Also I don't think anyone has posited what came BEFORE the big bang, obviously something did, energy can be neither created or destroyed or something to that effect. Lastly, the Big Bang theory does not negate the existence of God. To me, accepting the Big Bang theory doesn't make the universe any more understandable, it is just a thin layer on a very thick onion. It leaves open the question what what lies beneath the final layer of the onion. I don't think anyone of any intelligence or sanity claims to understand the universe, and probably we never will, so faith will always have a role to play.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next