SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (124002)1/29/2004 7:45:19 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Many of the anti-war people are sufficiently patriotic that they couldn't imagine the President of the United States publicly and repeatedly lying about such an important thing.

Carl, it does seem to me that the cries of "BUSH LIED! LIAR, LIAR, PANTS ON FIRE!" have been pretty loud and long from the anti-war people for the last year and more. Have you been living under a rock?

The arguments suggesting that Iraq had WMDs were simply not logically consistent, while the arguments that suggested that they'd been destroyed were.

Let me see - the arguments that Saddam had secretly destroyed his WMDS without telling the UN, so as to continue losing billions in oil revenue for no gain - those are you argument you are calling logically consistent? Didn't you call Saddam's strategy stupid one post ago?

Stupid in one post, only logical argument the next. Some consistency.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News