Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (124012)	1/29/2004 10:34:55 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Hi Nadine Carroll; Re: "Let me see - the arguments that Saddam had secretly destroyed his WMDS without telling the UN, so as to continue losing billions in oil revenue for no gain - those are you argument you are calling logically consistent? Didn't you call Saddam's strategy stupid one post ago? Stupid in one post, only logical argument the next. Some consistency." There's no contradiction. You're comparing apples and oranges. It's quite obvious to all that Saddam's strategy was stupid, it got him thrown out of power, LOL. Saddam's error was made back around 1991-95 when he secretly destroyed WMDs without keeping proof that he'd done it. His error was in failing to realize that the UN inspectors were going to be so thorough that he would later need to prove that he had destroyed those weapons. And as for the logic of the arguments that WMDs were massively stockpiled in Iraq, the problem was that no such weapons were found, either by the inspectors before the war, or by the US after the war. Does all your logic work this badly? -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next