Zo Re...Sorry, I don't feel like paying for attacks against Israel is a reason for the US to go to war on Iraq.
Look at my answer again. I gave a list of reasons why Iraq was chosen, over Iran, SA , or Syria. John tried to make the argument that because, according to John, Iraq supported terrorism less than the others. On the whole, that is possibly false, because Saddam used terror against his own people far more than the others. And Saddam bragged about his paying for terrorism against Israel; and while Iran, SA and Syria have programs, they all deny sponsoring terrorism. Saddam put a target on his chest, and said shoot. And we did.
Why should we fight Israel's war for them?
What? Do you feel that Israel should be the only country that fights terrorism? Whether it is France, England,Israel, the US, etc, what difference does it make. Saddam has no right to sponsor terrorism against any civilians of any country. Why do you consider the Israelis so sub human, that we should stand by, while Saddam tries to slaughter them.
you inadvertently feed into the anti-semitic calumny that states that we were fighting a proxy war for Israel.
More leftist dribble, trying to defend the slaughter of innocent civilians, while refusing to hold people doing the killing accountable. Sounds like a great platform for the dems to run on: " Sure Saddam was killing Israelis, but they are sub human anyway, so why should we help defend them?" Who knows, that might work better than your "Gw is stupid" campaign. |
