Oh. Well. Would you like me to pull up some posts where you have done exactly the same thing? It is rather common not to respond to every point in a post.
Because, sonny, I do not intend to wrote a 500-page book in response. And A$$, in its usual fashion, was simply throwing about wild, irresponsible slogans that it had read on cereal boxes. Its incapability to back its points with fact is thoroughly proven and well known. I do not intend to attempt to engage in debate with an idiot. Sometimes people forget who's who.
"clarity" is not a trait that A$$ is after. A$$ is after slogans and A$$'s intention is simply to repeat slogans it likes.
Now if you you look at my latests response to A$$, you notice I challenged it on ONE specific fact. Let's see how it handles that single point. My bet is that what is seen is smoke, fog, and obfuscation.
So let's see A$$ justify $1.5T. My figures show something like $300B to this point.
And, since A$$ got so upset by the use of the word "Communist", I assume it is unaware that documentation does exist showing Democrats have been members of the CPUSA. And not just FBI documentation. Some of the documentation is the KGB's own files which were delivered into the hands of Western intelligence agencies after the collapse of the USSR.
A$$ has a rather bad record of simply making up "facts" to "prove" its point. I DO NOT intend to spend large amounts of time refuting fiction. If you would like to see proof of my statement, I will provide them, although I think A$$ would rather not have these matters dragged up again.
Is SI misbehaving for you? The editing window seems to have developed some new bad habits. |
