SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (27392)2/1/2004 2:41:06 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) of 793964
 
Kerry was one of 15 Senators who voted in favor of Gay Marriage? Yes, it will hurt.

Kerry's Achilles' Heel

Exclusive commentary by Chad Allen
The Washington Dispatch

Jan 30, 2004

In all likelihood, it appears that Senator John Kerry will become the democratic presidential nominee, barring a Kerry-like resurrection by the Dean campaign or multiple victories by the Edwards campaign next week.

Senator Kerry seemingly matches up relatively well against President Bush and could have significant appeal to the moderate voting bloc, at least that was the thinking of primary voters in Iowa and New Hampshire earlier this month. Democrats point to Kerry’s distinguished military record and his “moderate” votes on NAFTA, welfare overhaul, and some tax policies, especially those dealing with investments, as evidence that Kerry has the military gravitas to lead and political views that are in touch with America.

While Kerry’s 19-year voting record dating back to the Reagan years will be picked apart by the Bush campaign, assuming Kerry receives the democratic nod, there’s one vote and one issue that could be Kerry’s Achilles’ heel. In 1996, Senator John Kerry voted against the “Defense of Marriage Act”, which banned federal recognition of same-sex “marriages” and gave states the ability to refuse recognition of gay “marriages” from other states. Only 14 other senators, all of them democrats, joined Senator Kerry.

This vote had virtually no political effect upon Kerry in his liberal home state of Massachusetts. It would also pose little problems for Kerry in New England during the presidential election. Recall that George W. Bush only received four electoral votes in New England, winning New Hampshire by less than 8,000 votes. While most New England, Upper Atlantic Coast, and West Coast voters, which represent a large majority of the democratic “Blue States”, will not look at Kerry negatively for this vote, it’s in the vitally important South and Midwest where this vote could crush the Kerry campaign.

In the 2000 presidential election, George Bush received 211 of his 271 electoral votes, or nearly 80%, from states in the South or Midwest. Leading democratic strategists and presidential contenders have been emphatic in stating that whomever wins the democratic nomination must have a better showing in the South and Midwest than Al Gore did four years ago in order to recapture the White House.

The problem for Kerry is that most of the voters in these states are moderately to deeply religious and are adamantly opposed to gay “marriage”. In an O’Leary Report/Zogby International poll conducted last month of likely voters from “Red” and “Blue” states, 70% of Red State voters stated that marriage should be confined to a man and woman. Furthermore, only 25% of Red State respondents supported the idea of civil unions. Senator Kerry has stated that he backs the concept of civil unions.

In the Bible Belt, which encompasses many of the Red States, religion and its guidance on political/social issues tends to trump in importance any other issues in presidential elections and will likely do so again this year. Of course, chief among these issues is abortion, as democrats have lost thousands if not millions of votes over the past three decades in the Red States solely due to their pro-abortion stances. Voting against the “Defense of Marriage Act” was akin to voting against bans on abortions to voters in these states and it is sure to cost Kerry critical votes. (Incidentally, Senator Kerry’s record on abortion will also hurt him in the Red States, as he carries a 0% rating with the National Right to Life and voted against a ban upon partial-birth abortions on three occasions.)

Social conservatives in these states, many of whom are democrats, see gay marriage and civil unions as an attack on the family. The same O’Leary/Zogby report found that only 10% of voters in Red States are single. Therefore, any issues that are deemed to influence the family, either positively or negatively, are likely to be key issues in these electorally valuable states.

With a Kerry nomination, the Democratic Party will continue to fight an uphill battle in the South and among other Red State voters to overcome the perception that the Party is not religion and family friendly. While the War on Terror and the economy will be viewed as the kingpin issues of the presidential campaign, if the race is close, then gay marriage could be the tiebreaker issue in the Midwest and the South. If so, it could cost John Kerry the White House.
washingtondispatch.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext