Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 174.69

0.0%

Dec 24 12:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kech who wrote (39052)	2/1/2004 3:51:26 PM
From: pyslent	Read Replies (1) of 197031

Perhaps Jim's approach of looking at installation cost estimates for ATT or Hutchison is the best way to do this. The problem with that is that no one (on this board) has seen any estimated installation costs for GSM1X for comparison (maybe the rumored deploying with CHU will be enlightening). Without such evidence, I see no reason to assume that GSM1X would be significantly cheaper (all other things being equal), especially since Qualcomm has never made any claims in that regard. Offhand, does anyone know how much Hutchinson has spent to deploy wCDMA at 2100 MHz, de novo?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next