SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush Bashers & Wingnuts
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (1028)2/2/2004 11:56:05 AM
From: Cola Can   of 1347
 
They allowed holding alright. Just about every offensive
play by NE, had a holding foul. It is "Superbowl
Corruptness." If the matchup was a regular game, I doubt
NE would have scored a point. Brady was protected due
to constant offensive line holding. The running success
of NE was due to "holding." Even on defense, NE was guilty
of holding sometimes, that wasn't called. NE didn't win the
Superbowl, it was "GIVE" to them. During one replay, I saw
three NE offensive linemen guilty of holding. One had the
Carolina defensive by the face mask. It wasn't a superbowl,
it was a "Super Scam." It was clear, during the first
quarter, that "they" wanted NE to win and that NE WOULD win.
How could Carolina win when they played by the rules and
NE didn't? Carolina won the superbowl. That is a fact,
based on fair play according to the rules. Carolina's
points were "HONEST" points, while NE's points were
based on cheating. There is no other way to put it.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News