Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sam who wrote (27745)	2/3/2004 4:53:56 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) of 793624

They had no "knowledge" of WMDs, they had no knowledge of any "gathering threat," because there was none to have any knowledge of at the time. Sam, are you seriously demanding that the President make decisions using only 20/20 hindsight? Every intelligence service in the world, including the French and the Germans, for gosh sakes, was 100% sure that Saddam had WMDs. Personally I won't be sure that he didn't until I learn who destroyed what when and what went to Syria during the 14 mos. advance warning Saddam got. Saddam had both had and used WMDs. Saddam was forming alliances of convenience with terrorist groups by the carload - Abu Nidal, Ansar al Islam, Uday's Fedayeen, his own homebrew crew at Salman Pak. His intent towards America was baneful. Iraq was the only country to openly rejoice at Sept 11th. Do you really think the President should have just waited and seen what Iraq chose to do after sanctions collapsed (it wouldn't have taken much longer) and Saddam reclaimed his full revenues and freedom of action, triumphant?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next