SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: D. Long who wrote (28000)2/5/2004 8:23:08 AM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) of 794410
 
Getting a constitutional amendment passed is unlikely imo. Even if Mass does it will take effect at its earliest two years after gay marriage is allowed. Thus if there is less of a problem or less voter opposition even the Mass amendment ultimately is unlikely to pass the legislature twice. I think the courts are wrong here but i do see Sullivans point lumping in Brown, and this decision and possibly rowe v wade. Judicial activism is judicial activism. And actually i hope that sullivan is right about gay marriage making the gay community more mainstream. Mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News