SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : WHO IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT IN 2004

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: calgal who wrote (9983)2/6/2004 4:28:43 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) of 10965
 
Limbaugh is full of it. Pretending he doesn't fear Kerry's war heroism and high-powered high-integrity record. Edwards is a fine candidate, but as a VP.

Kerry takes away Bush's ability to run as a commander in chief. Edwards doesn't. Kery will have most vets behind him. Edwards won't. Put Kerry and Edwards togther though and Bush-Cheney look like real boors and bores.

Limbaugh and I debated Kerry a year or so ago and he admitted he had nothing against Kerry except that he's a "Massachusetts liberal, and that's enough for me". Hence count the number of times Limbaugh will use "Massachusetts" as a label. Problem is, Kerry is no Dukakis type at all. He towers over Bush in almost every way.

Hey what about "Texas" as a label? After Enron, Delay and Bush's crookery, that should be an insult. The Dixie Chicks were right.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext