SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (28459)2/8/2004 7:21:19 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) of 793855
 
If marriage is going to be religious (because of its sacred significance), than the state should have nothing to do with it. Call formal legal unions something else, and let churches marry whom they will. I suspect many churches would marry gays- but at least the churches could duke it out amongst themselves, and we could have a rational way to treat all people equally before the law. The present system makes a mockery of marriage anyway- those straight divorce rates are something else. Clearly marriage doesn't mean much to a lot of straight people, and the idea that gays will ruin the whole thing is ludicrous, but if the folks who have an emotional attachment to marriage need a bone, I say give 'em the word, but make sure the legal rights meted out by the government are available to all.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext