SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tsigprofit who wrote (6778)2/10/2004 12:53:32 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) of 20773
 
The Uboat danger didn't last that long off the coast. Mostly out in the North Atlantic. The boats at that time needed suport ships, and we had long range bombers that could range out far enough to protect our shores once we recognized the need.

You're right -- not allowing the UK to go down was the reason we went into Europe. Not to protect outselves, but to protect the British.

Let's not forget that this whole discussion started when Redfish wrote "I am not so brave, and would prefer that our armed forces be used only to protect Americans, not strangers on the other side of the world." I was just pointing out that our engagement in Europe in WWII wasn't to protect Americans, but to protect, well maybe not strangers, but others on the other side of the world (Europe in 1940 was a lot further away than Iraq is today by any reasonable measure of travel, communications, information, etc.)

You seem to be supporting my position here, that we didn't go to Europe to protect Americans.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext