SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (538225)2/10/2004 4:26:08 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
Yes, I think that we needed to take care of the problem once and for all, as does David Kay. The regime was too vicious, sustained a capability and intent to recharge its programs, at a minimum, once it had gotten beyond the containment regime, and had a lot of money to use in aid of potential allies, like Al- Qaida. There were already calls for lifting of sanctions, due to Saddam's abuse of the humanitarian sale of oil proceeds, and the plight of Iraqi children; Saudi Arabia was already withdrawing basing privileges; and disenchantment with the stalemate, which entailed numerous sorties and exchanges of fire over the years, threatened to undermine Congressional support. If Saddam could have gotten a clean bill from Blix, he would have gotten out from under, and promptly begun to start over. Besides, I agree with Tenet, and think that Kay is wrong in his assessment of whether there were any stockpiles.

Of course, from my standpoint, the plight of the Iraqis under Saddam's regime, and the prospect of its continuation under one or the other of his sons was enough moral reason to invade, even granting that prudent considerations had to weighed as well.......
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext