Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neeka who wrote (29083)	2/11/2004 10:17:37 PM
From: zonkie	Read Replies (1) of 793717

If Janet had worn a low cut outfit which exposed all of the same flesh above the nipple would people have been so upset? Well, no because that is on TV all the time. If she had worn an outfit which exposed all of the flesh to the left of the nipple would people have been so upset? No because that is on TV all the time too. Well if she had shown all that flesh to the right of the nipple? Nope, that's on TV too. If she had worn a cut off t-shirt which exposed the same flesh below the nipple? Nope, wasn't even mush there to see due to sag. So what it boils down to is it must have been the nipple being exposed that did it. But wait, wasn't the nipple covered by some kind of silver star? The only thing I can figure is the total amount of flesh must have done it. So just be glad it wasn't Dolly who did it or it may have been in the supreme court by now instead of only senate hearings. This is a good example of how quickly the American justice system works when confronted with extremely important matters. Although on unimportant matters like Cheney witholding records of his meetings with Kenny-boy and others concerning the nations energy policy it may take a bit longer.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next