SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (182509)2/12/2004 6:34:08 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) of 1575955
 
Ted, That's why we had weapon inspectors in Iraq.......to keep him honest. And it was working!

No, it wasn't. Saddam wasn't being compliant, the inspections couldn't be conclusive one way or another, and the "oil-for-palaces" program was a smack in the face of U.N. humanitarianism.


Was he compliant like a boy scout? No. Was he compliant? Yes.

I am not sure what you think but Saddam is an adult and he was a leader of an Arab country........machismo runs strong in that culture. He was not about to jump to attention like a boy scout. No leader would in his position but then he had another thing going......he was living in a bad neighbhorhood. He couldn't afford to look weak.

So my question............was this about getting compliance.....which we did; or getting Saddam to jump like a boy scout, and then once airborne, asking "how high"? Because if it were the latter, it wasn't about to happen.

ted
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext