[Biomarkers for pancreatic cancer]
>>Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Feb 1;10(3):860-8.
Serum diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization mass spectrometry.
Koopmann J, Zhang Z, White N, Rosenzweig J, Fedarko N, Jagannath S, Canto MI, Yeo CJ, Chan DW, Goggins M.
Departments of. Pathology, Medicine, and Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
PURPOSE: Each year in the United States, approximately 30,000 people die from pancreatic cancer. Fewer than 5% of patients survive >5 years after diagnosis, because most patients present with advanced disease. Early diagnosis may improve the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. Experimental Design: In an attempt to improve on current approaches to the serological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, we analyzed serum samples from patients with and without pancreatic cancer using surface-enhanced laser desorption and ionization (SELDI) protein chip mass spectrometry. Using a case-control study design, serum samples from 60 patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were compared with samples from 60 age- and sex-matched patients with nonmalignant pancreatic diseases, as well as 60 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. To increase the number of proteins potentially identifiable, serum was fractionated using anion exchange and profiled on two ProteinChip surfaces (metal affinity capture and weak cation exchange). RESULTS: We determined a minimum set of protein peaks able to discriminate between patient groups and used the unified maximum separability algorithm to compare the performance of the individual marker panels alone or in conjunction with CA19-9. Among the peaks identified by SELDI profiling that had the ability to distinguish between patient groups, the 2 most discriminating protein peaks could differentiate patients with pancreatic cancer from healthy controls with a sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 97%. These 2 markers performed significantly better than the current standard serum marker, CA19-9 (P < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of the 2 markers was improved by using them in combination with CA 19-9. Similarly, a combination of 3 SELDI markers and CA19-9 was superior to CA19-9 alone in distinguishing individuals with pancreatic cancer from the combined pancreatic disease controls and healthy subject groups (P = 0.078). SELDI markers were also better than CA19-9 in distinguishing patients with pancreatic cancer from those with pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: SELDI profiling of serum can be used to accurately differentiate patients with pancreatic cancer from those with other pancreatic diseases and from healthy controls.<<
Would have been nice to see the numbers associated with the use of CA19-9 and the two markers. All we get from the abstract that was not in the PR is the type of chips used.
Cheers, Tuck |
