PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: CYBERKEN who wrote (539974)	2/13/2004 4:02:15 PM
From: Krowbar	Read Replies (1) of 769670

< Right or wrong? You do him too much justice. How about the possibility that Ritter was simply LYING?... > BEFORE the invasion of Iraq Scott Ritter spelled out in detail how Iraq was flown over with ground penetrating radar, including all suspected sites, and no missles or other weapons were found. This is just one example of methods that were used to find weapons, and none were found. But that didn't fit the Bush agenda of invading Iraq no matter what, so THAT kind of intelligence was dismissed, his right wing parrots were put to work smearing Ritter, and people like Chalabi were found that would tell them what they wanted to hear. Just as O'neill pointed out. How about the possibility that Bush was lying and deceiving, as all of the evidence so far says? Before the invasion there were plenty of people that wanted Bush to show them where he KNEW weapons were, but they were also dismissed. Why was that? Wouldn't just one site have made his case, as JFK did with the Cuban missile photos? Del

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next