SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (29638)2/15/2004 7:22:29 AM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (3) of 793622
 
I posted a while back that the best thing might be to have a Democrat as President for the duration for just the reasons Friedman describes. For those who favor US intervention, it took Bush to get us in, but we might get a better outcome with a more "nuanced" approach to finishing the job. It seems obvious to me that what Friedman describes would be the tack than a Democratic President would take, more or less. That's why I responded tartly to LB yesterday when he threw out that old chestnut about cutting and running. If "America's enemies are currently hearing only weakness from the Democratic camp," it's partly because so many American's on the right are proclaiming it for partisan purposes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News