SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: KyrosL who wrote (17369)2/17/2004 5:00:31 AM
From: OblomovRead Replies (1) of 306849
 
>>A national system, able to negotiate prices, results in lower costs.

As long as you don't consider MUCH less innovation to be a "cost".

Under national health care the government will just let the fatties die sooner, or will simply euthanize them. It will be done with great patriotic bluster and a sigh of relief from Washington: "Whew! One fewer area in which human charity applies! Hooray!"

Why would such a society need new drugs? Expensive new therapies would just prolong lives and, thus, costs.

More government regulation is NOT the answer.

Here are CIA statistics on infant mortality and life expectancy in different countries...They are not making me proud.

Is this because of a lack of health care? Or are there other, more salient reasons?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News