SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: carranza2 who wrote (124838)2/19/2004 5:59:03 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I'm not sure if that would've helped. Klaus Fuchs was already passing Manhattan Project material to the Soviets as early as 1942, a couple of years before the Rosenbergs became involved. I think the Soviets were destined to have it. A couple of the more "idealistic" scientists were determined to ensure the technology would not be owned by just one country. So, politically, it may have been the wise thing to do, but the American scientists were going to feed the Soviet scientists anyway. Post-WWII, as you suggest, was already too late.

The only foolproof course would have been to kill all the Manhattan Project scientists before the Manhattan Project got started. <yes, i'm kidding>

"The wise thing to have done was to utterly, ruthlessly and credibly destroyed the technology after using it in WWII, then instituted severe controls on the production of enriched material in atomic power plants because, face it, the first pro-life-[a]rators were the Rosenbergs."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext