Re: THE 9/11 FRAUD: Red Flags
Well, from Day One I've doubted the official spiel we were fed by the US authorities and their media mouthpieces... However, that's the EASY part --debunking official nonsense is easy, all the more so when it's a hasty coverup for such a wild catastrophe as 911. It's impossible, even for the US's savvy spinmeisters and crisis fixers, to tie up each and every loose end that inevitably crops up in a mega-conspiracy like 911. Hence the anomalous collapse of "buidling #7" nearby the WTC, the "coincidental" death of Mrs Barbara Olson, the "pre-emptive" assassination of Tajik leader Ahmad Shah Massoud, the reported car-bomb(?) explosion at the State Dept (on Sept 11) that's immediately removed and censored from EVERY media record....
But then, the $1,000,000 question is, what really happened? All along, I've tried to keep a middle-ground approach, that is, I've dismissed both extremes: the official extreme theory that pinned it all on Bin Laden and also the "conspiracy nut" extreme that branded the whole plot as an inside CIA-FBI-White-House conspiracy. To start with, I thought it safe to rely on the timeline of events as an uncompromised basis from which to "extrapolate".... That's why I've always insisted upon the assassination of Massoud as the trigger of 911. Which led me to suspect Russia as a key mastermind of 911 --which in turn elucidate the sudden downfall of Russian counterespionage expert Robert Hanssen. The part that's still mysterious to me is the US connection of 911: how far and how deep were US officials involved?
Gus |
