SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (544461)2/24/2004 12:47:16 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
Nope. I am speaking at a much more fundamental level than mere behavior. I am looking at DNA, seeing the bio-informational identities that comprise its identity and then based on that fundamental and OBJECTIVE identity making judgements on behavior. All human DNA is objectively comprised of identities from exactly one man and exactly one woman and nothing else. That is the sexual identity pattern that is inherent to the DNA. It is heterosexual - not homosexual. Since it is not homosexual, then no one has the right to force it to support behavior that is contrary to its essential sexual identity pattern. It clearly and objectively is not homosexual in nature. It is heterosexual in nature. All human DNA is heterosexual, being comprised of bio-informational identities of exactly one man and exactly one woman - and nothing else.

That is all completely objective fact, with not one single shred of arbitrariness.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News