SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Road Walker who wrote (183515)2/24/2004 5:56:13 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1574002
 
What if, as was reported earlier, Saudi Arabia can't increase their oil output, and oil goes to $60 a barrel over the next 17.5 years (or $100 a barrel)? What if there is true turmoil in the ME, and the oil supply to the rest of the world decreases by 60%?

As things start to move in that direction solar (and even more so conservation) will make more sense. People respond to changing prices that's how a market system works.

It's hell trying to be positive with solutions on this thread

I don't think that there needs to be government directed (even if the direction is only tax incentives) solutions. Right now importing oil just makes sense. Any other alternative will result in much higher costs and do a lot of damage to the economy. And yes $60+ oil would do damage to the economy as well but it might not happen, at least not for a long time. There isn't much point in putting the hit on the economy now.

If $1000 tax credit on solar powered homes would greatly reduce the hit from disruptions in the oil supply then maybe it might make some sense but it will do very little to reduce the hit of such a price increase. It won't hurt too much either but actually trying to not import oil would.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext