SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (183597)2/25/2004 12:02:03 PM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) of 1577462
 
AS Re...Cheney was CEO of Halliburton. That's not a link?

Only if you can show a linkage, between current mangament at Hal. and Cheney. Show a direct linkage, between Cheney, and the DOD, and current management, under which those contracts, were taken. In your case, you would have to get rid of all lawyers, if Edwards wins the vote. My mother bore me, but is she really responsible for my acts now.

The energy papers Cheney is hiding from the publlic despite court orders show that when he came into power he had no qualms about spreading our wealth back to the energy companies that had helped he and GW get into office with their huge contributions and stealthy phony energy crisis gougings of California.

Outlandish speculation on your part. Thats like saying a private meeting between the pastor, and its custodians, proves they were planning to rape their parishoners. You have no idea, what acutally was said, or who said it. And there might be good reasons for protecting their privacy. The same reasons, lawyers protect their clients private converstions. Which is, you get better, more honest input, if you let the participants freely express their opinions, without a bunch of lawyers screening their words for possible, non connected lawsuits later on. If this lawsuit wins, that might make it impossible for the gov. to solicit opinions from anyone, as every particular interest, seems to have an opposing interst, in this country.

What's good for Texas is always bad for the rest of us.

In the Enron case, what was good for Texas, would have been for GW to pass legislation, to allow Enron to continue with the same policies, Clinton had. The changing of the speculative oil markets, and allowing producers more access to the Ca. market did in Enron, not anything Bill did.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext