SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (4426)2/27/2004 11:10:49 PM
From: brushwudRead Replies (1) of 81568
 
Seems like you've got some of your facts wrong.

I do?

The first generation to receive SS paid little or nothing into the system. Over 50% of America's elderly were living in poverty before SS. The government doesn't hold your money for you. It takes money from workers and give it to retirees. That's how it started, that's how it's always been.

Yes, that's exactly why someone called it "Taxes & Welfare".

Reagan increased SS taxes in '83 so it could run surpluses to prepare for the Boomers retirement. SS loaned that surplus money to the treasury. SS holds about $2 trillion of our nation's $7 trillion debt.

That's basically true, but contradicts what you said before: "The government doesn't hold your money for you... That's how it started, that's how it's always been."

Bush used SS surplus projections to justify his cuts in estate and income taxes. Now that those cuts are bankrupting us, they want to say we can't afford to pay SS benefits.

"They" "want" to say? It was Greenspan who suggested cutting benefits, not Bush or anyone in the Administration. Greenspan was appointed to his post twice by the last Democrat president.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext