Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (125357)	2/29/2004 10:13:33 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Hi Hawkmoon; Re: "Especially the fact that David Kay has PROVEN that Saddam had NO INTENTION of obeying the UN sanctions against WMD related activities." David Kay provided no evidence of "WMD related activities", either, only speculation. And Bush isn't in trouble for lying about Iraq having "WMD related activities", he's in trouble for lying about Iraq having WMDs, a simple fact that you still try to dodge, but which, in fact, caught you more than just flat-footed, it caught you flat in the middle of the forehead. It's now late winter, 2004. Bush is in political trouble for the WMD situation in Iraq. Chirac and Putin smell like roses. But here you are, still arguing that Bush was right, LOL. -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next