SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonkie who wrote (4676)3/1/2004 8:28:30 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (2) of 173976
 
That's his prerogative, he started the thread, he's the moderator, but if he bans every democrat after the first post they make I don't think he could have a beef for being banned from any other board.

I see. Then you will have a talk with ChinuSFO about my banning from the Kerry thread, right? I was having a calm, reasonable discussion with CalculatedRisk when "laura bush" backed in, hind end first, in her inimitable fashion and tossed one of her classically insulting posts at me. Let me give you a recent, easy to find, similar example of what happened.
Message 19830782
Message 19832101
except worse. Now Geoff and I were having a reasonable discussion that she butted into with stink bombs. I advised him to ignore her and our discussion has continued sporadically since. I also said just about the opposite what she expected. There goes her rep as a mindreader.

Now on Chinu's Kerry thread she did the same thing. I shot back, although not with the vigor I been attacked. Chinu banned me for nastiness, Nothing happened to "laura"- -even though she started a fight that previously did not exist. I repeatedly asked Chinu for an explanation on other threads and via PM. He never answered.

But I disagree with your basic premise in any case. Is it all right for Poet to ban me from LWP? And Mephisto from Donkey's Inn? If so, why is there a problem with JLA banning you from RWET? There are threads oriented towards a particular political persuasion and if they say that's what they are, I see no problem with banning those not in agreement.

What I do see a problem with is claiming a thread is fairly and evenly run, then acting just the opposite. And, as others already have said, I'd say FaultLine has shown a thread can be fairly run.

After reading the thread (and the 2 revisions) I see that he started the thread because he was banned from another thread and his new thread was a sort of revenge for the treatment he felt he didn't deserve on the other thread.
Why is that a problem? Poet does it. Mephisto does it. tsigprofit does it. Have you complained to them about their policies?

He bans all people who didn't share his extremist views
His views are extremist according to you. Your views are extremist according to him. That's what makes politics.

That's his prerogative, he started the thread, he's the moderator, but if he bans every democrat after the first post they make I don't think he could have a beef for being banned from any other board.
Actually, I don't remember that he has.

Without looking it up I am going to flat out say that that is a pure falsehood. He has never "just asked a question."
Prove it.

I feel PartyTime has been more than fair on this thread.
Message 19865093

Read the original board header on this thread, then ask yourself what jlallen would do if this was his board.

Oh, he'd ban you. And the header would make it clear that that was his prerogative. Actually, it's the prerogative of any threadhead of a moderated thread. You don't like it, you are certainly free to start your own thread and ban them.

Oh, you can include me in that indictment:
Subject 54156
One of the requirements there is that you're in good standing on RWET.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext