Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: John Carragher who wrote (125430)	3/2/2004 11:43:52 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Hi John Carragher; Re: "Country [Iraq] continues to get more secure ..." To bad you wrote this just before the bloodiest day since Bush declared the war over: At Least 143 Die in Attacks at Two Sacred Sites in Iraq ... It was the deadliest day in the 11 months since American troops toppled Saddam Hussein's Sunni Muslim-dominated government. ... John F. Burns, NY Times, March 3, 2004 nytimes.com Iraq is about 1/10th the size of the US, so that 150 or so killed, when scaled to a US sized nation, is equivalent to about 1/2 of the WTC attack. Hardly secure. Re: "... and independent." In this you are correct, in that our troops are no longer enforcing the peace as much. We're taking fewer casualties, but it's not like we're leaving behind a stable government. Already the locals are fighting with each other more than they're fighting us, and while I think that this is a good thing, I would prefer that we simply pull our troops out completely. If we don't have our troops keep the peace, there's really no reason for them to be there, and no reason for them to keep getting killed. -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next