John Re...It's funny the way you furtively search for a sentence you can argue with, while ignoring the central point of the article, which you can't argue with.
First off, if your theorems are wrong, then your theory is wrong. Secondly, whether it is the main point or a side point, it was an erroneous statement. Why post articles which are garbage, where the premises are wrong. Since you have not countered my argument, I assume you agree with my assestment, that the US has intervened in countries who weren't a direct threat, in the past. Thirdly, his theory, that we are stretched too thin, is just plain wrong, as we have close to 125,000 troops stationed in Japan, SK, and Europe, which aren't needed there; almost as many as there are stationed in Afghanistan, and Iraq. |
