SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rat dog micro-cap picks--now moderated

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bucky Katt who started this subject3/4/2004 2:16:20 PM
From: tsigprofit  Read Replies (1) of 1338
 
Why the US must create 150K jobs per month to stay even **
Job boom still a hope, not a fact

Economists expect that robust job growth is right around the corner -- but maybe not in February.
March 4, 2004: 12:41 PM EST
By Mark Gongloff, CNN/Money staff writer

NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Though some economists hope Friday will bring blockbuster unemployment and payroll growth figures, there are few signs that the job market was much different in February than it was in January, when it was recovering, but far from full strength.

On Friday, the Labor Department is scheduled to release its figures for February unemployment and non-farm payrolls growth. Economists, on average, expect that unemployment held steady at 5.6 percent and that payrolls grew by 125,000 jobs, according to Briefing.com.

Such job growth would be nothing to sneeze at. But the labor force grows by about 150,000 people a month, meaning that, even if economists' forecasts are accurate -- no sure thing, of course -- there would still be about 25,000 more people looking for work.

"It's not what we'd like to see," said Carl Tannenbaum, chief economist at LaSalle Bank/ABN Amro in Chicago, which expects 100,000 new jobs in February.

Twenty-seven months after the end of the last recession, payrolls are still 2.35 million jobs below where they were when the recession began, in March 2001, making this the longest job slump since the Labor Department started keeping track in 1939.

money.cnn.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext