SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: D. Long who wrote (33018)3/5/2004 7:26:19 AM
From: redfish  Read Replies (1) of 793841
 
"First, Bush was in office less than 9 months."

That is nine months more than Kerry has been president.

"Second, his ability to do anything about the 9/11 attackers was limited to the ability of federal agencies like FBI and CIA to find, comprehend, and act."

And who was in charge of the FBI and CIA at the time? Kerry?

"The important fact is that FBI and CIA failed. And they failed in large measure because of the cuts, restraints, and demoralization under the Clinton Administration."

If the FBI and CIA failed, why are the same persons in charge of the FBI and CIA? Why haven't any heads rolled? And why is Kerry responsible for their failure, while Bush isn't?

"Kerry, by the way, is a member of the Committee on Foreign Relations and is thus privy to sensitive intelligence."

More so than Bush? Also, why is Kerry culpable for 9/11, but the other members of that Committee aren't?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News