SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend....

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sully- who wrote (106)3/5/2004 5:32:04 PM
From: Sully-   of 35834
 
Talk about being a hypocrite & managing to keep a straight
face the whole time......

Two New Democratic Memos

They tell another story in the Judiciary Committee wars.

As the investigation into the Senate Judiciary Committee Democratic strategy memos reaches a climax, National Review Online has obtained two new Democratic documents that were downloaded by a Republican staffer sometime in the period from late 2001 to spring 2003.

Ironically, the two documents, apparently written by an aide to Democratic Sen. Edward Kennedy, concern a Republican memo that had been mistakenly sent to Democrats. <font size=4>In November, 2001, a top aide to Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch sent a strategy e-mail to several other Republicans. One of the intended recipients was a Hatch staffer whose last name was Johnson. But instead of going to the Republican Johnson, the memo went to a woman named Olati Johnson, who was a top Kennedy aide.

Olati Johnson forwarded the GOP memo to several colleagues. Republican staffers asked her to delete the memo, since it had been sent to her in error.<font size=3> It is not clear whether the GOP aides made that request before or after Johnson had sent the memo around, but <font size=4>in any case, Democrats eventually gave the GOP document to the press.

The two newly obtained Democratic documents are fact sheets written for Sen. Kennedy so he could answer possible inquiries about the matter. One document is a set of talking points which says, "There was no impropriety, as the information sent to [Olati Johnson] was not confidential or privileged information." The talking points also say that any Republican complaints about the leak should be characterized as a GOP attempt to change the subject from the strategy discussed in the original, misdirected e-mail.<font size=3>

Republicans do not claim that Democrats stole the e-mail — after all, it was a Republican who mistakenly sent it to Democrats. (Indeed, a Republican staffer made a handwritten note suggesting that in the future they label e-mails "privileged and/or confidential.) But <font size=4>some in the GOP do believe that the Democrats' talking point arguments — that the original e-mail was not confidential or privileged, and that the leak of it was not as important as the behavior it described — undermine current Democratic positions in the leak controversy. In the current matter, Democrats are arguing that their memos were confidential, and are denying charges that their calls for an investigation are an attempt to change the subject from the behavior described in the memos.
<font size=3>
The two Democratic documents were in the possession of Manuel Miranda, the former aide to Hatch and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist who resigned under pressure during the memo investigation. Miranda says he discovered the memos Wednesday night while going through some unrelated papers. Miranda's lawyer forwarded copies of the documents to the Senate Sergeant-at-Arms office Thursday morning.

To read both memos, click here, and here [Adobe Acrobat Reader necessary to read them].
nationalreview.com
nationalreview.com

nationalreview.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext