SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: russwinter who wrote (9687)3/8/2004 9:56:41 AM
From: rubed  Read Replies (1) of 110194
 
No, what they are trying to do is redirect migrants to smaller provincial cities. So rather than moving to the major coastal cities or inland provincial capitals, they want them to move to the smaller provincial cities (under a million). They are supporting this by directing investment to these areas as well as government transfer to these municipalities. The number I have always heard is that China needs 7% growth in order to absorb all the migrants pushed off farm. Wen Jiabao also just said at the opening of congress that they would aim for 7% growth this year but with a focus on reducing rural/urban inequalities through targeted investment in rural areas.

China is trying to modernize its agriculture just like everything else in their country. Their 'farm to forest' policy is really unbelievable in its scope as it is the type of thing you just couldn't do anywhere else in the world. They are returning a huge amount of semi-arable land (which never should have been farmed and is causing huge environmental damage) back to its original use as rangeland, forest and hillside... and removing those farmers from the land as a result. The Chinese saw the light on some environmental issues with the Yangtze floods in 1998 and are moving in some areas - though it is still an incredibly polluted mess here.

rube
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext